Start here
Before You Fix It: What This Check Means
Skip links let keyboard and assistive users bypass repeated chrome and reach main content quickly. In plain terms, this tells you whether people using keyboards or assistive tech can use the page reliably. Scavo searches for skip-link patterns and validates target anchors.
Why this matters in practice: issues here can block completion for assistive-tech users and create compliance exposure.
How to use this result: treat this as directional evidence, not final truth. Automated checks do not replace complete manual assistive-technology validation. First, confirm the issue in live output: verify with keyboard flow and at least one assistive-technology pass Then ship one controlled change: Add one skip link near top of document source order. Finally, re-scan the same URL to confirm the result improves.
Background sources
TL;DR: There's no skip link for keyboard users to bypass navigation and jump directly to main content.
Keyboard-only users and screen reader users must tab through every navigation link on every page load without a skip link. On a site with 50+ nav links, this means pressing Tab 50 times before reaching content. A skip link is one line of HTML and a few lines of CSS — it's the simplest accessibility win with the highest impact for keyboard users.
What Scavo checks (plain English)
Scavo searches for skip-link patterns and validates target anchors.
Detection logic includes links such as:
href="#main"href="#content"- Link text containing "Skip"
Then Scavo validates whether each #target ID exists in the DOM.
How Scavo scores this check
Result behavior:
- Pass: skip link found with at least one valid target
- Warning: skip link exists but target anchor missing
- Info: no skip link found
In your scan report, this appears under What failed / What needs attention / What is working for skip_links, followed by Recommended next steps and Technical evidence (for developers) when needed.
- Scan key:
skip_links - Category:
ACCESSIBILITY
Why fixing this matters
Keyboard and assistive-technology users rely on skip links for efficient navigation. Missing or broken targets create repetitive effort and can make page navigation frustrating.
For large sites with heavy nav patterns, this is a high-impact usability improvement with low implementation cost.
Common reasons this check flags
- Skip link present but target ID removed during layout refactor.
- Link points to
#mainwhile actual container uses different ID. - Skip link only exists on some templates.
- CSS hides skip link permanently (instead of showing on focus).
If you are not technical
- Test first-tab behavior on homepage and key templates.
- Confirm skip link becomes visible on keyboard focus.
- Ensure jump target lands at meaningful main content start.
- Re-scan and verify warning/info clears.
Technical handoff message
Copy and share this with your developer.
Scavo flagged Skip Navigation Links (skip_links). Please implement a visible-on-focus skip link to main content and verify that its target ID exists and is consistent across templates.If you are technical
- Add one skip link near top of document source order.
- Point it to stable main-content target (
id="main"or equivalent). - Ensure target is focusable/landmark-meaningful where needed.
- Keep skip link hidden visually until focus, not removed from accessibility tree.
- Validate across all public template layouts.
How to verify
- Use keyboard only: first tab should reveal skip link.
- Activate skip link and confirm focus/scroll lands at main content.
- Check target anchor exists on all relevant templates.
- Re-run Scavo and confirm pass.
What this scan cannot confirm
- It does not fully test visual/focus styling quality of the skip link.
- It does not cover every route variant unless scanned.
- It does not replace manual keyboard navigation QA.
Owner checklist
- [ ] Assign owner for keyboard-navigation baseline controls.
- [ ] Add skip-link check to accessibility release QA.
- [ ] Keep main-content anchor stable across template updates.
- [ ] Recheck after nav/header component changes.
FAQ
Is a main landmark alone enough?
It helps, but skip links still provide quick keyboard bypass behavior.
Should skip links be visible all the time?
Typically they are hidden until focus to reduce visual clutter while staying keyboard-accessible.
Can one skip link cover all pages?
Yes if target IDs and layout conventions are consistent.
What should we fix first?
Broken target anchors first, then ensure consistent implementation across templates.
Sources
- W3C WAI: Bypass blocks (skip links)
- WCAG Technique G1: Adding a skip link
- W3C WAI: Page structure regions
Need a skip-link snippet that works with your current layout system? Send support your header/main template structure.